Quadro T500 Mobile vs GeForce GT 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
620M 710A 720A 720M 800M 810M 820A 820M GT 625M GT 710M GT 720A GT 820M
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 820M with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GT 820M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.31

T500 Mobile outperforms GT 820M by a whopping 529% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 820M GT 820M
T500 Mobile Quadro T500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1021503
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.5234.18
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF117TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date27 November 2013 (11 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96896
Core clock speed775 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors585 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate12.4094.92
Floating-point processing power0.2976 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−620%
36
+620%
1440p2−3
−650%
15
+650%
4K2−3
−750%
17
+750%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how GT 820M and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 620% faster in 1080p
  • T500 Mobile is 650% faster in 1440p
  • T500 Mobile is 750% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.31 8.24
Recency 27 November 2013 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 18 Watt

GT 820M has 20% lower power consumption.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 529% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 820M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 820M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GeForce GT 820M
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 820M GeForce GT 820M
vs
GT 635M GeForce GT 635M
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 560 Radeon Pro 560
GT 820M GeForce GT 820M
vs
GTS 250M GeForce GTS 250M
ATI 9250 Radeon 9250
vs
9300M GS GeForce 9300M GS
RTX 3080 12 GB GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
vs
R7 360 Radeon R7 360
RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070
vs
R5 230 OEM Radeon R5 230 OEM
RTX 5070 Ti RTX 5070 Ti
vs
GTX TITAN Z GTX TITAN Z
RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q
vs
GTX 660 GTX 660
Arc B580 Arc B580
vs
S10000 Passive 12GB FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
ATI 2460 Multi-View FirePro 2460 Multi-View
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
GTX 460 GeForce GTX 460
vs
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm
vs
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 127 votes

Rate GeForce GT 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 111 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 820M or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.