ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs GeForce GT 755M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking723not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.33no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK107RV610
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 June 2013 (12 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38440
Core clock speed980 MHz525 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate31.362.100
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPS0.042 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs324
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 June 2013 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 20 Watt

GT 755M has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 2400 PRO PCI, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M and Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GeForce GT 755M
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 96 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 11 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M or Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.