GMA 3150 vs GeForce GT 755M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7251594
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.34no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGK107Pineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 June 2013 (12 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed980 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate31.360.8
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs161
TMUs322
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 755M 1726
+86200%
Samples: 820
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p56no data
Full HD22no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Escape from Tarkov 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Fortnite 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Escape from Tarkov 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Fortnite 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Escape from Tarkov 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Escape from Tarkov 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Escape from Tarkov 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 June 2013 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 13 Watt

GT 755M has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 284.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GeForce GT 755M
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 97 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 174 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.