Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

Place in the ranking	558	95
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	48.33
Power efficiency	6.16	13.78
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code name	N14P-?	Navi 22
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 November 2013 (12 years ago)	17 October 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	2560
Core clock speed	980 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 1300 Million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	2x ~50 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	413.0
ROPs	no data	64
TMUs	no data	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2x 2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	2x 128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5400 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−456%

200−210
+456%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

2.75

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −448%	230−240 +448%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −459%	95−100 +459%
Hogwarts Legacy	14−16 −433%	80−85 +433%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	35−40 −456%	200−210 +456%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −448%	230−240 +448%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −459%	95−100 +459%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −438%	140−150 +438%
Fortnite	45−50 −451%	270−280 +451%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −456%	200−210 +456%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −442%	130−140 +442%
Hogwarts Legacy	14−16 −433%	80−85 +433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −452%	160−170 +452%
Valorant	80−85 −442%	450−500 +442%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	35−40 −456%	200−210 +456%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −448%	230−240 +448%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	120−130 −447%	700−750 +447%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −459%	95−100 +459%
Dota 2	60−65 −392%	300−310 +392%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −438%	140−150 +438%
Fortnite	45−50 −451%	270−280 +451%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −456%	200−210 +456%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −442%	130−140 +442%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−33 −433%	160−170 +433%
Hogwarts Legacy	14−16 −433%	80−85 +433%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −431%	85−90 +431%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −452%	160−170 +452%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −424%	110−120 +424%
Valorant	80−85 −442%	450−500 +442%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	35−40 −456%	200−210 +456%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −459%	95−100 +459%
Dota 2	60−65 −392%	300−310 +392%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −438%	140−150 +438%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −456%	200−210 +456%
Hogwarts Legacy	14−16 −433%	80−85 +433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −452%	160−170 +452%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −424%	110−120 +424%
Valorant	80−85 −442%	450−500 +442%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

45−50
−451%

270−280

+451%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −433%	80−85 +433%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	60−65 −384%	300−310 +384%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 −450%	55−60 +450%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −445%	240−250 +445%
Valorant	90−95 −449%	500−550 +449%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	18−20 −456%	100−105 +456%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −459%	95−100 +459%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −426%	100−105 +426%
Hogwarts Legacy	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −445%	60−65 +445%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

16−18

−459%

95−100
+459%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −426%	100−105 +426%
Hogwarts Legacy	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Valorant	40−45 −448%	230−240 +448%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Dota 2	30−33 −433%	160−170 +433%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −438%	70−75 +438%
Hogwarts Legacy	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

8−9
−400%

40−45

+400%

This is how GT 755M SLI and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:

RX 6750 GRE is 456% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.03	44.88
Recency	1 November 2013	17 October 2023
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	2 Watt	250 Watt

GT 755M SLI has 12400% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 458.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

GeForce GTX 960M

Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Radeon RX 5500

GeForce GT 755M SLI

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 23 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

4.2 246 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M SLI or Radeon RX 6750 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

Aggregate performance score

Contents

Primary details

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Form factor & compatibility

VRAM capacity and type

Connectivity and outputs

API and SDK support

Gaming performance

Average FPS across all PC games

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

Vote for your favorite

Other comparisons

Community ratings

Comments