Radeon Graphics vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
750M 750M Mac Edition 750M SLI 755M 755M Mac Edition 755M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics Graphics 384SP Graphics 448SP Graphics 512SP Instinct Vega VII

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 755M SLI with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

GT 755M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB GDDR5, 2 Watt
8.01
+338%

755M SLI outperforms Graphics by a whopping 338% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 755M SLI GT 755M SLI
Graphics Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking553958
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Power efficiency6.159.37
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameN14P-?Renoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2013 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768448
Core clock speed980 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.344 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5400 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+350%
8−9
−350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Fortnite 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Valorant 80−85
+361%
18−20
−361%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+374%
27−30
−374%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Dota 2 60−65
+408%
12−14
−408%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Fortnite 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Valorant 80−85
+361%
18−20
−361%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Dota 2 60−65
+408%
12−14
−408%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Valorant 80−85
+361%
18−20
−361%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+340%
10−11
−340%
Valorant 90−95
+406%
18−20
−406%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

This is how GT 755M SLI and Graphics compete in popular games:

  • GT 755M SLI is 350% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.01 1.83
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 15 Watt

GT 755M SLI has a 337.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 650% lower power consumption.

Graphics, on the other hand, has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 755M SLI GeForce GT 755M SLI
vs
GTX 960M GeForce GTX 960M
Graphics Radeon Graphics
vs
R5 A240 Radeon R5 A240
GT 755M SLI GeForce GT 755M SLI
vs
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
HD 6990M Crossfire HD 6990M Crossfire
vs
GTX 670MX GTX 670MX
HD 6990M Crossfire HD 6990M Crossfire
vs
FX 4800 FX 4800
GT 755M SLI GT 755M SLI
vs
GeForce 820M 820M
GT 755M SLI GT 755M SLI
vs
HD 7630M HD 7630M
GT 755M SLI GT 755M SLI
vs
GT 1030 GK107 GT 1030 GK107
GTX 485M SLI 485M SLI
vs
GTX 675MX 675MX
GTX 485M SLI GTX 485M SLI
vs
HD 7590M HD 7590M
GTX 485M SLI GTX 485M SLI
vs
FirePro V7900 V7900
GTX 485M SLI GTX 485M SLI
vs
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
GTX 485M SLI GTX 485M SLI
vs
HD Graphics 610 HD Graphics 610

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 23 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 7910 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M SLI or Radeon Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.