GeForce 8200M G vs GT 755M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GT 755M SLI and GeForce 8200M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GT 755M SLI outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 5081% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 536 | 1458 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.99 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | no data |
| GPU code name | N14P-? | MCP77MV MCP79MVL |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 November 2013 (11 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2x 1300 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2x ~50 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 10 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 36 | 0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+314%
|
7−8
−314%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+232%
|
24−27
−232%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+1055%
|
10−12
−1055%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+663%
|
8−9
−663%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+314%
|
7−8
−314%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+320%
|
5−6
−320%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+232%
|
24−27
−232%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+663%
|
8−9
−663%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+314%
|
7−8
−314%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+320%
|
5−6
−320%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+232%
|
24−27
−232%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 45−50 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 60−65
+6100%
|
1−2
−6100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+4300%
|
1−2
−4300%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+9100%
|
1−2
−9100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Dead Island 2 | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dead Island 2 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+18.8%
|
16−18
−18.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 40−45
+4100%
|
1−2
−4100%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Dead Island 2 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 755M SLI is 4300% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GT 755M SLI surpassed 8200M G in all 26 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.29 | 0.16 |
| Recency | 1 November 2013 | 3 June 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 80 nm |
GT 755M SLI has a 5081.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
