A100 SXM4 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking491not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.06no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameN14P-?GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686912
Core clock speed980 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rateno data609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 TFLOPS
ROPsno data160
TMUsno data432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2E
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB40 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,555 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.140
CUDA+8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 14 May 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 400 Watt

GT 755M SLI has 19900% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M SLI and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.