RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GT 755M Mac Edition
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.00

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms 755M Mac Edition by a whopping 1956% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking927107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.09
Power efficiency3.0745.11
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK107AD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 November 2013 (12 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842816
Core clock speed1085 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2130 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate34.72187.4
Floating-point processing power0.8333 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs3288
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22
L1 Cache32 KB2.8 MB
L2 Cache256 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.00 41.11
Recency 8 November 2013 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 70 Watt

GT 755M Mac Edition has 40% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 1955.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 11 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 66 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.