Tesla P4 vs GeForce GT 750M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 750M SLI with Tesla P4, including specs and performance data.

GT 750M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB DDR3, GDDR5
6.94

Tesla P4 outperforms GT 750M SLI by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking560243
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.45
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN14P-GTGP104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)13 September 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speed967 MHz886 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1114 MHz
Number of transistors1300 Million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data178.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.704 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 - 5000 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
−221%
170−180
+221%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Valorant 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Dota 2 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Fortnite 40−45
−217%
130−140
+217%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−221%
180−190
+221%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−233%
70−75
+233%
Valorant 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
World of Tanks 163
−207%
500−550
+207%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Dota 2 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−221%
180−190
+221%
Valorant 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−233%
130−140
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
World of Tanks 50−55
−220%
160−170
+220%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Valorant 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Fortnite 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Valorant 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%

This is how GT 750M SLI and Tesla P4 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla P4 is 221% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.94 23.33
Recency 1 April 2013 13 September 2016
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm

Tesla P4 has a 236.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla P4 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 750M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 750M SLI is a notebook card while Tesla P4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
GeForce GT 750M SLI
NVIDIA Tesla P4
Tesla P4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 16 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 73 votes

Rate Tesla P4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.