Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics vs GeForce GT 750M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 750M SLI and Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 750M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB DDR3, GDDR5
6.33
+415%

GT 750M SLI outperforms HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics by a whopping 415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5761041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN14P-GTno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2013 (12 years ago)8 February 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768480
Core clock speed967 MHz400 / 700 MHz
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GBno data
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 - 5000 MHz1800 MHz
Shared memory-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 750M SLI 6.33
+415%
HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 1.23

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 750M SLI 4634
+361%
HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 1006

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 750M SLI 16142
+377%
HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 3384

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
+470%
10−12
−470%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Fortnite 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Valorant 70−75
+112%
30−35
−112%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 163
+462%
27−30
−462%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Dota 2 50−55
+206%
16−18
−206%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Fortnite 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Valorant 70−75
+112%
30−35
−112%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Dota 2 50−55
+206%
16−18
−206%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Valorant 70−75
+112%
30−35
−112%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%
Valorant 70−75
+1380%
5−6
−1380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how GT 750M SLI and HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:

  • GT 750M SLI is 470% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 750M SLI is 2700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GT 750M SLI surpassed HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics in all 48 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.33 1.23
Recency 1 April 2013 8 February 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GT 750M SLI has a 414.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 750M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
GeForce GT 750M SLI
AMD Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 16 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6520G HD 7450M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 750M SLI or Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.