GeForce 210 vs GT 750M SLI

Place in the ranking	562	1330
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	0.70
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	N14P-GT	GT218
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)	12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$29.49

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	16
Core clock speed	967 MHz	589 MHz
Number of transistors	1300 Million	260 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	30.5 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105 °C
Texture fill rate	no data	4.160
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	4
TMUs	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Height	no data	2.731" (6.9 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount	2x 2 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	2x 128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 - 5000 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	8.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	DVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	no data	4.1
OpenGL	no data	3.1
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	-	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

53
+2550%

2−3

−2550%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

14.75

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18	0−1
Metro Exodus	18−20	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22	0−1
Valorant	24−27 +2300%	1−2 −2300%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16	0−1
Dota 2	24−27 +2300%	1−2 −2300%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Fortnite	40−45 +4000%	1−2 −4000%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +2300%	1−2 −2300%
Metro Exodus	18−20	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +2700%	2−3 −2700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24	0−1
Valorant	24−27 +2300%	1−2 −2300%
World of Tanks	163 +2229%	7−8 −2229%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16	0−1
Dota 2	24−27 +2300%	1−2 −2300%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +2700%	2−3 −2700%
Valorant	24−27 +2300%	1−2 −2300%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +3700%	1−2 −3700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7	0−1
World of Tanks	50−55 +2400%	2−3 −2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Far Cry 5	14−16	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	14−16	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	10−11	0−1
Metro Exodus	10−11	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11	0−1
Valorant	18−20	0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11	0−1
Dota 2	18−20	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18	0−1
Metro Exodus	3−4	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	18−20	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9	0−1
Fortnite	7−8	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	8−9	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	4−5	0−1
Valorant	7−8	0−1