GeForce 210 vs GT 750M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 750M SLI with GeForce 210, including specs and performance data.

GT 750M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB DDR3, GDDR5
6.62
+2107%

GT 750M SLI outperforms 210 by a whopping 2107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5621330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.70
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameN14P-GTGT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$29.49

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed967 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistors1300 Million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30.5 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data4.160
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data2.731" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 - 5000 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
+2550%
2−3
−2550%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data14.75

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Dota 2 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Fortnite 40−45
+4000%
1−2
−4000%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
World of Tanks 163
+2229%
7−8
−2229%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Dota 2 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Valorant 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 8−9 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1
World of Tanks 50−55
+2400%
2−3
−2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 10−11 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1
Valorant 18−20 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Fortnite 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Valorant 7−8 0−1

This is how GT 750M SLI and GeForce 210 compete in popular games:

  • GT 750M SLI is 2550% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.62 0.30
Recency 1 April 2013 12 October 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GT 750M SLI has a 2106.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 750M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 210 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 750M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce 210 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
GeForce GT 750M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 16 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 3717 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.