Radeon R5 M335 vs GeForce GT 740

Place in performance ranking	665	956
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.19	0.02
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	GK107	Exo XT DDR3
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	29 May 2014 (10 years ago)	16 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$89	no data
Current price	$279 (3.1x MSRP)	$891

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 740 has 850% better value for money than R5 M335.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	320
Compute units	no data	5
Core clock speed	993 MHz	1070 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1070 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	64 Watt	unknown
Texture fill rate	31.78	21.40
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	684.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 740 and Radeon R5 M335 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1100 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	no data	-
Enduro	no data	-
HD3D	no data	+
PowerTune	no data	+
DualGraphics	no data	1
TrueAudio	no data	-
ZeroCore	no data	+
Switchable graphics	no data	1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
Mantle	no data	+
CUDA	3.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 740 3.86
+172%

R5 M335 1.42

GeForce GT 740 outperforms Radeon R5 M335 by 172% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 740 1489
+172%

R5 M335 548

GeForce GT 740 outperforms Radeon R5 M335 by 172% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 740 1950
+114%

R5 M335 911

GeForce GT 740 outperforms Radeon R5 M335 by 114% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

30−35
+150%

−150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

+150%

4−5
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Hitman 3	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Hitman 3	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +167%	6 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +167%	3 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
+150%

2−3

−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+150%

4−5
−150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%