P102-100 vs GeForce GT 740

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 740 with P102-100, including specs and performance data.

GT 740
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 64 Watt
3.27

P102-100 outperforms 740 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking766554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.191.02
Power efficiency4.122.41
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK107GP102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 May 2014 (11 years ago)12 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

P102-100 has 437% better value for money than GT 740.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843200
Core clock speed993 MHz1582 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1683 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)64 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate31.78336.6
Floating-point processing power0.7626 TFLOPS10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs32200
L1 Cache32 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache256 KB2.5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB5 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s440.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.06.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 740 3.27
P102-100 7.46
+128%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 740 1448
Samples: 2410
P102-100 3300
+128%
Samples: 4

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 740 4241
P102-100 66011
+1456%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GT 740 4306
P102-100 66704
+1449%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.27 7.46
Recency 29 May 2014 12 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 64 Watt 250 Watt

GT 740 has 290.6% lower power consumption.

P102-100, on the other hand, has a 128.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The P102-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 740 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 740 is a desktop graphics card while P102-100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GeForce GT 740
NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1345 votes

Rate GeForce GT 740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 36 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 740 or P102-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.