Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce GT 735M

Place in the ranking	936	526
Place by popularity	not in top-100	48
Power efficiency	3.57	18.84
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GK208	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	80
Core clock speed	575 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	889 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.40	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.4416 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Standard memory configuration	DDR3	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 735M 1.69

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.57
+348%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 735M 1713

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332
+211%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 735M 5688

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
+282%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 735M 1024

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010
+292%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 735M 6757

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21931
+225%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	17 −341%	75−80 +341%
Full HD	20 +5.3%	19 −5.3%
1440p	2−3 −400%	10 +400%
4K	3−4 −367%	14 +367%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−250%

14
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −217%	18−20 +217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −225%	13 +225%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −880%	45−50 +880%
Hitman 3	6−7 −167%	16 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −169%	40−45 +169%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −178%	24−27 +178%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −82.4%	62 +82.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −217%	18−20 +217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10 +150%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −880%	45−50 +880%
Hitman 3	6−7 −150%	15 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −169%	40−45 +169%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −167%	24 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −83.3%	21−24 +83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −44.1%	49 +44.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −217%	18−20 +217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8 +100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −880%	45−50 +880%
Hitman 3	6−7 −100%	12 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +0%	16 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −122%	20 +122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +9.1%	11 −9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−567%

20−22
+567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Hitman 3	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −900%	10 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −422%	45−50 +422%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−225%

12−14
+225%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−400%

5−6
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−133%

7−8
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 +0%	19 +0%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	38 +0%	38 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16 +0%	16 +0%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	27 +0%	27 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

10−11

+0%

10−11

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +0%	16 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Hitman 3	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

This is how GT 735M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 341% faster in 900p
GT 735M is 5% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 400% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 367% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 735M is 9% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GT 735M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 49 tests (70%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.69	7.57
Recency	1 April 2013	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	28 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 347.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 17.9% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 735M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.