NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M vs Intel UHD Graphics 610

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
Value for money (0-100)
Gen. 9 Kaby Lake
GPU code name
Kaby Lake GT1
Market segment
Release date
1 January 2013 (8 years ago)
1 January 2019 (2 years ago)
Price now

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
Core clock speed
725 MHz
300 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
950 MHz
Number of transistors
1,270 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
33 Watt
15 Watt
Texture fill rate
Floating-point performance
552.2 gflops
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce GT 730M and UHD Graphics 610 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size
medium sized
no data
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
no data
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 - 2000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
no data
Shared memory

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs


Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync
no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 730M 3.11 +2%
UHD Graphics 610 3.05

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 730M 7152 +39.2%
UHD Graphics 610 5139

3DMark Fire Strike Score

GT 730M 1001 +67.7%
UHD Graphics 610 597

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 730M 1061 +67.4%
UHD Graphics 610 634

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 730M 1722 +88.2%
UHD Graphics 610 915

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GT 730M 14 +40%
UHD Graphics 610 10

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 730M 86656 +108.7%
UHD Graphics 610 41521

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GT 730M and UHD Graphics 610. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Both graphics cards satisfy the 72% minimum and 61% recommended requirements of all games known to us.


Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

GT 730M
UHD Graphics 610
22 +83.3%
12 −83.3%

Competitors of GeForce GT 730M from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GT 730M from AMD is Radeon R7 (Kaveri), which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GT 730M:

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M

2% higher performance in benchmarks

More pipelines (384 vs 12)

Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)

PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)

CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 610

Much newer (1 January 2019 vs 1 January 2013)

Cheaper ($601 vs $1000)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)

Lower power consumption (15W vs 33W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M and Intel UHD Graphics 610. The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
Intel UHD Graphics 610

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.