ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GT 730M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 730M and Mobility Radeon HD 4830, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 730M
2013
2 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
2.11
+47.6%

GT 730M outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4830 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8751003
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.41no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK107M97
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date20 January 2013 (12 years ago)3 March 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384640
Core clock speed725 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million826 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate23.2017.60
Floating-point processing power0.5568 TFLOPS0.704 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Standard memory configurationDDR3/GDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s44.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 730M 2.11
+47.6%
ATI Mobility HD 4830 1.43

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 730M 6788
+75.7%
ATI Mobility HD 4830 3863

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Elden Ring 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Dota 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Elden Ring 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Fortnite 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
World of Tanks 52
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Dota 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how GT 730M and ATI Mobility HD 4830 compete in popular games:

  • GT 730M is 57% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Elden Ring, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GT 730M is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 730M is ahead in 37 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.11 1.43
Recency 20 January 2013 3 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GT 730M has a 47.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 730M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4830 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
GeForce GT 730M
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830
Mobility Radeon HD 4830

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 266 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.