GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile vs GT 730

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking855not rated
Place by popularity34not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency3.05no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGF108GB203
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 June 2014 (10 years ago)2025
Launch price (MSRP)$59.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores968192
Core clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate11.2 GT/s512.0
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS32.77 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs16256
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s1.01 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.110.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 175 Watt

GT 730 has 257.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 730 and GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 730 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GeForce GT 730
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 5942 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.