GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs GT 730

Place in performance ranking	823	82
Place by popularity	17	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.19	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GF108	GN20-E6
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 June 2014 (10 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$59.99	no data
Current price	$77 (1.3x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	5888
Core clock speed	700 MHz	915 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	125 Watt (80 - 125 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	11.2 GT/s	248.2
Floating-point performance	268.8 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 730 and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.1	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 730 2.16

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 41.90
+1840%

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 730 by 1840% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 730 1170

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 27776
+2274%

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 730 by 2274% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	5−6 −2220%	116 +2220%
1440p	3−4 −2333%	73 +2333%
4K	2−3 −2250%	47 +2250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
−2050%

129

+2050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2333%	70−75 +2333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −2040%	107 +2040%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −2133%	130−140 +2133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2000%	80−85 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −2120%	111 +2120%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2125%	85−90 +2125%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1960%	100−110 +1960%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1850%	150−160 +1850%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1850%	117 +1850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2038%	170−180 +2038%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −1850%	110−120 +1850%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −1880%	95−100 +1880%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −2017%	254 +2017%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −2040%	107 +2040%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2333%	70−75 +2333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −2125%	89 +2125%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −2133%	130−140 +2133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2000%	80−85 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2125%	89 +2125%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2125%	85−90 +2125%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1960%	100−110 +1960%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1850%	150−160 +1850%
Hitman 3	2−3 −2750%	57 +2750%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2038%	170−180 +2038%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −1850%	110−120 +1850%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −1880%	95−100 +1880%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −1920%	202 +1920%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1989%	188 +1989%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −1920%	100−110 +1920%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2333%	70−75 +2333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1850%	78 +1850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2000%	80−85 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1925%	81 +1925%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2125%	85−90 +2125%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1850%	150−160 +1850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2038%	170−180 +2038%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1878%	178 +1878%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1960%	103 +1960%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −2167%	68 +2167%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−1880%

95−100
+1880%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −1925%	80−85 +1925%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1860%	95−100 +1860%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −2200%	45−50 +2200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −1933%	61 +1933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50 +2400%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1900%	100 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −2100%	85−90 +2100%
Hitman 3	3−4 −2200%	69 +2200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −2200%	90−95 +2200%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1850%	75−80 +1850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1857%	137 +1857%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1967%	60−65 +1967%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −2400%	50 +2400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−2300%

70−75
+2300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2050%	40−45 +2050%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −3500%	35−40 +3500%
Hitman 3	1−2 −3300%	30−35 +3300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −2600%	50−55 +2600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −3300%	30−35 +3300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −2433%	76 +2433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2800%	27−30 +2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −3500%	36 +3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2500%	26 +2500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2400%	24−27 +2400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1867%	55−60 +1867%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −2600%	50−55 +2600%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −2100%	40−45 +2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −2800%	29 +2800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−3700%

35−40
+3700%

This is how GT 730 and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 2220% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 2333% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 2250% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.16	41.90
Recency	18 June 2014	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	125 Watt