Tesla S2050 vs GeForce GT 720M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1137not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.44no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK208GF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date25 December 2013 (11 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192448 ×4
Core clock speed719 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHzno data
Number of transistors915 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt900 Watt
Texture fill rate12.1332.14 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs848 ×4
TMUs1656 ×4
L1 Cache16 KB896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 GB ×4
Standard memory configurationDDR3no data
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed800 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s148.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 2560x1600no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 2560x1600no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 December 2013 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 900 Watt

GT 720M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 2627.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla S2050, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 720M and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 720M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla S2050 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
GeForce GT 720M
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1117 votes

Rate GeForce GT 720M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 720M or Tesla S2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.