Radeon R7 350X OEM vs GeForce GT 720M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1050 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 2.50 | no data |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) |
GPU code name | GK208 | Oland |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 25 December 2013 (10 years ago) | 5 May 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Number of transistors | 915 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 65 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 | 25.20 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.2911 TFLOPS | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 8 | 8 |
TMUs | 16 | 24 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | no data |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 32 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | no data |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | no data |
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | no data |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | no data |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP content protection | + | - |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | - |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | - |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | - |
Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 25 December 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 65 Watt |
GT 720M has 97% lower power consumption.
R7 350X OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 720M and Radeon R7 350X OEM. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 720M is a notebook card while Radeon R7 350X OEM is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.