GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs GT 710M

Place in performance ranking	1034	177
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.49	18.84
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GF117	N18E-G1 TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	9 January 2013 (11 years ago)	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$23	$1250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 Mobile has 3745% better value for money than GT 710M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	1920
Core clock speed	775 MHz	960 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	80-90 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.40	144.0
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 710M and GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 710M 1.15

RTX 2060 Mobile 29.40
+2457%

RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms GT 710M by 2457% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 710M 445

RTX 2060 Mobile 11354
+2451%

RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms GT 710M by 2451% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	4−5 −2525%	105 +2525%
1440p	2−3 −3000%	62 +3000%
4K	1−2 −4000%	41 +4000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

1−2

−4800%

45−50
+4800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2933%	91 +2933%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −3450%	71 +3450%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −2875%	119 +2875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2833%	88 +2833%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −4800%	45−50 +4800%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2525%	105 +2525%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −2650%	110 +2650%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −2600%	108 +2600%
Hitman 3	3−4 −2667%	83 +2667%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −2880%	149 +2880%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −2500%	130 +2500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3233%	100 +3233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −2880%	149 +2880%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −2767%	86 +2767%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −3500%	72 +3500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −2700%	56 +2700%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −2525%	105 +2525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2533%	79 +2533%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −4800%	45−50 +4800%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2733%	85 +2733%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −2633%	82 +2633%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −2700%	280 +2700%
Hitman 3	2−3 −3150%	65 +3150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −2700%	196 +2700%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −3133%	97 +3133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2833%	88 +2833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2975%	123 +2975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2675%	111 +2675%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −2614%	190 +2614%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −4900%	50 +4900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −4700%	48 +4700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2800%	58 +2800%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −4800%	45−50 +4800%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3000%	62 +3000%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2833%	88 +2833%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −3033%	94 +3033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2575%	107 +2575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −2900%	60 +2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −3700%	38 +3700%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−2533%

79
+2533%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −3150%	65 +3150%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −2567%	80 +2567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −3900%	40 +3900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −3700%	38 +3700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2850%	59 +2850%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	20−22
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3050%	63 +3050%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −2850%	55−60 +2850%
Hitman 3	1−2 −4500%	46 +4500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −3400%	70 +3400%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −2700%	55−60 +2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −3250%	65−70 +3250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −3700%	35−40 +3700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −2700%	28 +2700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3000%

62
+3000%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −3100%	32 +3100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −2900%	30 +2900%
Hitman 3	1−2 −2700%	28 +2700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	25
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −3800%	39 +3800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	25
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	22
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	20
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	8−9
Far Cry 5	0−1	21
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −4000%	41 +4000%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −2800%	27−30 +2800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	15

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−2900%

30
+2900%

This is how GT 710M and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is 2525% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 3000% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 4000% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.15	29.40
Recency	9 January 2013	6 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	80 Watt