Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
800M vs GT 710M
Price now
23$
Games supported
51%
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
- Core clock speed 775 MHz
- Max video memory 1024 MB
- Memory type DDR3
- Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
- Core clock speed 738 MHz
- Max video memory 1024 MB
- Memory type DDR3
- Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Price now
163$
Games supported
51%
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance rating | 973 | 971 |
| Value for money | 0.49 | 0.03 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | GF117 | GF117 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 January 2013 (10 years old) | 17 March 2014 (9 years old) |
| Current price | $23 | $163 |
Value for money
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 585 million | 585 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 5.904 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 141.7 gflops |
Dimensions and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GPU Boost | no data | 2.0 |
| Optimus | no data | + |
| GameWorks | no data | + |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
GeForce 800M outperforms GeForce GT 710M by 1% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
GeForce GT 710M outperforms GeForce 800M by 61% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GT 710M and GeForce 800M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | no data | 15 Mh/s |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 1.13 | 1.14 |
| Recency | 9 January 2013 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 48 |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of GeForce GT 710M by AMD
The nearest GeForce GT 710M's AMD equivalent is Radeon HD 7560D, which is faster by 3% and higher by 12 positions in our performance rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GT 710M:
Competitors of GeForce 800M by AMD
The nearest GeForce 800M's AMD equivalent is Radeon HD 7560D, which is faster by 2% and higher by 10 positions in our performance rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 800M:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
