Radeon RX 7600M vs GeForce GT 710
Aggregated performance score
Radeon RX 7600M outperforms GeForce GT 710 by 525% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 903 | 407 |
| Place by popularity | 48 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 0.04 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | RDNA 3 |
| GPU code name | GK208B | Navi 33 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 March 2014 (10 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | no data |
| Current price | $81 (2.3x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 1792 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2070 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 915 million | 13,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 90 Watt (50 - 90 Watt TGP) |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 15.26 | 246.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | no data |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on GeForce GT 710 and Radeon RX 7600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | no data |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 16000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | Portable Device Dependent |
| Multi monitor support | 3 displays | no data |
| HDMI | + | no data |
| HDCP | + | no data |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Vision | + | no data |
| PureVideo | + | no data |
| PhysX | + | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon RX 7600M outperforms GeForce GT 710 by 525% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Radeon RX 7600M outperforms GeForce GT 710 by 525% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 8
−463%
| 45−50
+463%
|
| 1440p | 3
−500%
| 18−20
+500%
|
| 4K | 7
−471%
| 40−45
+471%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−2000%
|
21−24
+2000%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−170%
|
27−30
+170%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5
−420%
|
24−27
+420%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1700%
|
35−40
+1700%
|
| Hitman 3 | 5
−420%
|
24−27
+420%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−325%
|
16−18
+325%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−214%
|
21−24
+214%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−2000%
|
21−24
+2000%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−170%
|
27−30
+170%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4
−550%
|
24−27
+550%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1700%
|
35−40
+1700%
|
| Hitman 3 | 2−3
−1200%
|
24−27
+1200%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3
−400%
|
14−16
+400%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−325%
|
16−18
+325%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−214%
|
21−24
+214%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−2000%
|
21−24
+2000%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4
−550%
|
24−27
+550%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1700%
|
35−40
+1700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3
−600%
|
21−24
+600%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−275%
|
14−16
+275%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
−77.8%
|
16−18
+77.8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−160%
|
12−14
+160%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| Hitman 3 | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−120%
|
10−12
+120%
|
This is how GT 710 and RX 7600M compete in popular games:
- RX 7600M is 463% faster than GT 710 in 1080p
- RX 7600M is 500% faster than GT 710 in 1440p
- RX 7600M is 471% faster than GT 710 in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600M is 3400% faster than the GT 710.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 7600M surpassed GT 710 in all 43 of our tests.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 1.63 | 10.18 |
| Recency | 27 March 2014 | 5 January 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 90 Watt |
The Radeon RX 7600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GT 710 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7600M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
