Quadro K510M vs GeForce GT 710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 705 OEM GT 710 GT 710 PCI GT 720 GT 730 GT 730 OEM GT 740
VS
Quadro K500M Quadro K510M Quadro K610M Quadro K620M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 710 with Quadro K510M, including specs and performance data.

GT 710
2014
2 GB DDR3, 19 Watt
1.63

K510M outperforms GT 710 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 710 GT 710
Quadro K510M Quadro K510M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking956945
Place by popularity71not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency5.883.79
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGK208GK208
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date27 March 2014 (10 years ago)23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$34.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192192
Core clock speed954 MHz846 MHz
Number of transistors915 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt30 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.2613.54
Floating-point processing power0.3663 TFLOPS0.3249 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8MXM-A (3.0)
Length145 mmno data
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1.8 GB/s600 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s19.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGANo outputs
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Display Portno data1.2
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
PureVideo+-
PhysX+-
Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 710 1.63
Quadro K510M 1.66
+1.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 710 627
Quadro K510M 641
+2.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+0%
8−9
+0%
1440p4
+0%
4−5
+0%
4K6
+0%
6−7
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.37no data
1440p8.75no data
4K5.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
−80%
9−10
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
−80%
9−10
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−300%
12−14
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GT 710 and Quadro K510M compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro K510M is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro K510M is ahead in 4 tests (8%)
  • there's a draw in 47 tests (92%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.63 1.66
Recency 27 March 2014 23 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 30 Watt

GT 710 has an age advantage of 8 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 57.9% lower power consumption.

Quadro K510M, on the other hand, has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GT 710 and Quadro K510M.

Be aware that GeForce GT 710 is a desktop card while Quadro K510M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710
NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Quadro K510M
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
ATI HD 2900 PRO Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Quadro K510M Quadro K510M
vs
NVS 5400M NVS 5400M
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
GT 720 GeForce GT 720
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
HD 7690M Radeon HD 7690M
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
HD 8550M Radeon HD 8550M
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
R2 (Stoney Ridge) Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
HD 7290 Radeon HD 7290
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5830 Mobility Radeon HD 5830
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5165 Mobility Radeon HD 5165

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 4319 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.