Quadro FX 4500 vs GeForce GT 710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 710 with Quadro FX 4500, including specs and performance data.

GT 710
2014
2 GB DDR3, 19 Watt
1.48
+174%

GT 710 outperforms FX 4500 by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10051261
Place by popularity72not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency5.930.38
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGK208G70
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 March 2014 (11 years ago)28 July 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$34.99 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GT 710 and FX 4500 have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed954 MHz430 MHz
Number of transistors915 million302 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt109 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.2610.32
Floating-point processing power0.3663 TFLOPSno data
ROPs816
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1.8 GB/s525 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s33.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
PureVideo+-
PhysX+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 710 1.48
+174%
FX 4500 0.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 710 Samples: 7956 621
+174%
FX 4500 Samples: 95 227

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+300%
2−3
−300%
1440p3
+200%
1−2
−200%
4K7
+250%
2−3
−250%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.37
+28468%
1249.50
−28468%
1440p11.66
+21326%
2499.00
−21326%
4K5.00
+24897%
1249.50
−24897%
  • GT 710 has 28468% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GT 710 has 21326% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GT 710 has 24897% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Valorant 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 20
+186%
7−8
−186%
Far Cry 5 4
+300%
1−2
−300%
Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+200%
3−4
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Metro Exodus 3
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 18
+200%
6−7
−200%
Far Cry 5 4
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
+200%
1−2
−200%
Valorant 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Valorant 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Valorant 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

This is how GT 710 and FX 4500 compete in popular games:

  • GT 710 is 300% faster in 1080p
  • GT 710 is 200% faster in 1440p
  • GT 710 is 250% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 0.54
Recency 27 March 2014 28 July 2005
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 109 Watt

GT 710 has a 174.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 473.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4500 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 710 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 4500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
Quadro FX 4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4706 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 710 or Quadro FX 4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.