GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GT 710

Place in the ranking	957	35
Place by popularity	72	16
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	83.15
Power efficiency	5.91	25.53
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GK208	AD106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	27 March 2014 (10 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$34.99	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 Ti has 207775% better value for money than GT 710.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	4352
Core clock speed	954 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	160 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	95 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	15.26	344.8
Floating-point processing power	0.3663 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	48
TMUs	16	136
Tensor Cores	no data	136
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	145 mm	240 mm
Height	2.713" (6.9 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1.8 GB/s	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support	3 displays	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision	+	-
PureVideo	+	-
PhysX	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 710 1.63

RTX 4060 Ti 59.33
+3540%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 710 626

RTX 4060 Ti 22814
+3544%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8 −3525%	290−300 +3525%
1440p	4 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
4K	6 −3400%	210−220 +3400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.37 −218%	1.38 +218%
1440p	8.75 −207%	2.85 +207%
4K	5.83 −207%	1.90 +207%

RTX 4060 Ti has 218% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti has 207% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti has 207% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −3233%	300−310 +3233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Elden Ring	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −3233%	300−310 +3233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	8 −3525%	290−300 +3525%
Metro Exodus	5 −3500%	180−190 +3500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −3471%	250−260 +3471%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −3233%	300−310 +3233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Dota 2	12 −3233%	400−450 +3233%
Elden Ring	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Far Cry 5	15 −3233%	500−550 +3233%
Fortnite	8−9 −3525%	290−300 +3525%
Forza Horizon 4	5 −3500%	180−190 +3500%
Grand Theft Auto V	9 −3233%	300−310 +3233%
Metro Exodus	4 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −3429%	600−650 +3429%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −3471%	250−260 +3471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −3525%	290−300 +3525%
World of Tanks	30−35 −3536%	1200−1250 +3536%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −3233%	300−310 +3233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Dota 2	18 −3511%	650−700 +3511%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −3233%	400−450 +3233%
Forza Horizon 4	5 −3500%	180−190 +3500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −3429%	600−650 +3429%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 −3400%	350−400 +3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
World of Tanks	10−11 −3400%	350−400 +3400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −3233%	300−310 +3233%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −3400%	210−220 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	5 −3500%	180−190 +3500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −3233%	100−105 +3233%
Valorant	7−8 −3471%	250−260 +3471%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −3338%	550−600 +3338%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −3233%	500−550 +3233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −3233%	500−550 +3233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Dota 2	7 −3471%	250−260 +3471%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	5 −3500%	180−190 +3500%
Valorant	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%

This is how GT 710 and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti is 3525% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti is 3400% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti is 3400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.63	59.33
Recency	27 March 2014	18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	160 Watt

GT 710 has 742.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 3539.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.