CMP 30HX vs GeForce GT 710

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 710 with CMP 30HX, including specs and performance data.

GT 710
2014
2 GB DDR3, 19 Watt
1.50

CMP 30HX outperforms GT 710 by a whopping 1206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking974276
Place by popularity60not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0422.92
Power efficiency5.7911.48
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK208TU116
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 March 2014 (11 years ago)25 February 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$34.99 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

CMP 30HX has 57200% better value for money than GT 710.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921408
Core clock speed954 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors915 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt125 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.26157.1
Floating-point processing power0.3663 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1688

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Length145 mm229 mm
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1.8 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGANo outputs
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
PureVideo+-
PhysX+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 710 1.50
CMP 30HX 19.59
+1206%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 710 624
CMP 30HX 8135
+1204%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 710 1946
CMP 30HX 67806
+3384%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GT 710 1957
CMP 30HX 60741
+3004%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−1150%
100−110
+1150%
1440p3
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
4K7
−1186%
90−95
+1186%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.37
+82.7%
7.99
−82.7%
1440p11.66
+95.7%
22.83
−95.7%
4K5.00
+77.6%
8.88
−77.6%
  • GT 710 has 83% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GT 710 has 96% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GT 710 has 78% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Far Cry 5 5
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Fortnite 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Valorant 35−40
−1186%
450−500
+1186%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−1112%
400−450
+1112%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Dota 2 20
−1200%
260−270
+1200%
Far Cry 5 4
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Fortnite 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Metro Exodus 3
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Valorant 35−40
−1186%
450−500
+1186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Dota 2 18
−1178%
230−240
+1178%
Far Cry 5 4
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Valorant 35−40
−1186%
450−500
+1186%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Valorant 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Valorant 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

This is how GT 710 and CMP 30HX compete in popular games:

  • CMP 30HX is 1150% faster in 1080p
  • CMP 30HX is 1067% faster in 1440p
  • CMP 30HX is 1186% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.50 19.59
Recency 27 March 2014 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 125 Watt

GT 710 has 557.9% lower power consumption.

CMP 30HX, on the other hand, has a 1206% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The CMP 30HX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 710 is a desktop card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710
NVIDIA CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 4469 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 32 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 710 or CMP 30HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.