NVS 3100M vs GeForce GT 650M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 650M with NVS 3100M, including specs and performance data.

GT 650M
2012
2 GB DDR3\GDDR5, 45 Watt
3.06
+488%

GT 650M outperforms NVS 3100M by a whopping 488% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7641237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.782.61
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGK107GT218
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speedUp to 900 MHz606 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate30.404.848
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS0.04698 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\GDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80.0 GB/s12.64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 650M 3.06
+488%
NVS 3100M 0.52

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 650M 1205
+491%
NVS 3100M 204

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 650M 9682
+764%
NVS 3100M 1121

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p31
+520%
5−6
−520%
Full HD32
+540%
5−6
−540%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Valorant 45−50
+64.3%
27−30
−64.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 72
+350%
16−18
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Valorant 45−50
+64.3%
27−30
−64.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Valorant 45−50
+64.3%
27−30
−64.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Valorant 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how GT 650M and NVS 3100M compete in popular games:

  • GT 650M is 520% faster in 900p
  • GT 650M is 540% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 650M is 2100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GT 650M surpassed NVS 3100M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.06 0.52
Recency 22 March 2012 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 14 Watt

GT 650M has a 488.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 3100M, on the other hand, has 221.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 650M is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 3100M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M is a notebook graphics card while NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GeForce GT 650M
NVIDIA NVS 3100M
NVS 3100M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 473 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 138 votes

Rate NVS 3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M or NVS 3100M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.