Radeon RX 7800 XT vs GeForce GT 650M SLI

Place in the ranking	631	30
Place by popularity	not in top-100	60
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	67.90
Power efficiency	no data	16.52
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	N13E-GE	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	3840
Core clock speed	790 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	835 MHz	2430 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	263 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	583.2
Floating-point processing power	no data	37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	96
TMUs	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2x2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	2x 128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	624.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.2
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 650M SLI 5.09

RX 7800 XT 63.02
+1138%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 650M SLI 3597

RX 7800 XT 65611
+1724%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 650M SLI 12812

RX 7800 XT 134322
+948%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	79 −1103%	950−1000 +1103%
Full HD	49 −339%	215 +339%
1440p	9−10 −1256%	122 +1256%
4K	5−6 −1360%	73 +1360%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.32
1440p	no data	4.09
4K	no data	6.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −2091%	241 +2091%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −2245%	258 +2245%
Elden Ring	14−16 −1507%	225 +1507%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −680%	110−120 +680%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −1718%	200 +1718%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −773%	96 +773%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −2224%	488 +2224%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −1325%	171 +1325%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −613%	110−120 +613%
Valorant	14−16 −1860%	290−300 +1860%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −680%	110−120 +680%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −1382%	163 +1382%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −627%	80 +627%
Dota 2	16−18 −947%	178 +947%
Elden Ring	14−16 −1607%	230−240 +1607%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −352%	113 +352%
Fortnite	30−33 −723%	240−250 +723%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −1795%	398 +1795%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −947%	178 +947%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −1125%	147 +1125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −400%	210−220 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −613%	110−120 +613%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −988%	170−180 +988%
Valorant	14−16 −1860%	290−300 +1860%
World of Tanks	139 −101%	270−280 +101%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −680%	110−120 +680%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −1255%	149 +1255%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −573%	74 +573%
Dota 2	16−18 −1135%	210−220 +1135%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −388%	120−130 +388%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −1519%	340 +1519%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −400%	210−220 +400%
Valorant	14−16 −1860%	290−300 +1860%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	5−6 −2700%	140 +2700%
Elden Ring	6−7 −2533%	150−160 +2533%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 −2700%	140 +2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −430%	170−180 +430%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1800%	75−80 +1800%
World of Tanks	35−40 −1078%	400−450 +1078%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −988%	85−90 +988%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −203%	97 +203%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −860%	48 +860%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −1355%	160−170 +1355%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2938%	243 +2938%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −3600%	148 +3600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −1738%	147 +1738%
Valorant	14−16 −1721%	250−260 +1721%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −794%	152 +794%
Elden Ring	2−3 −4000%	80−85 +4000%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −850%	152 +850%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −6200%	63 +6200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −1393%	200−210 +1393%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −850%	152 +850%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −1925%	80−85 +1925%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1000%	22 +1000%
Dota 2	16−18 −1135%	210−220 +1135%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1650%	100−110 +1650%
Fortnite	4−5 −2300%	95−100 +2300%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −3150%	130 +3150%
Valorant	5−6 −2800%	140−150 +2800%