Radeon RX 570X vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GT 650M SLI with Radeon RX 570X, including specs and performance data.
650M SLI outperforms 570X by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 690 | 692 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.94 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | N13E-GE | Polaris 20 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 (13 years ago) | 11 April 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 790 MHz | 1168 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 835 MHz | 1244 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 159.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 5.095 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 128 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 241 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 79
+5.3%
| 75−80
−5.3%
|
| Full HD | 50
+11.1%
| 45−50
−11.1%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+16.7%
|
18−20
−16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+16.7%
|
18−20
−16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16−18
−12.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Fortnite | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+7.3%
|
55−60
−7.3%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+16.7%
|
18−20
−16.7%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 139
+6.9%
|
130−140
−6.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+2.5%
|
40−45
−2.5%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16−18
−12.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Fortnite | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+7.3%
|
55−60
−7.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+2.5%
|
40−45
−2.5%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16−18
−12.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+7.3%
|
55−60
−7.3%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40
+2.9%
|
35−40
−2.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+16.7%
|
30−33
−16.7%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+2%
|
50−55
−2%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
This is how GT 650M SLI and RX 570X compete in popular games:
- GT 650M SLI is 5% faster in 900p
- GT 650M SLI is 11% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.66 | 4.60 |
| Recency | 22 March 2012 | 11 April 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
GT 650M SLI has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score.
RX 570X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GT 650M SLI and Radeon RX 570X.
Be aware that GeForce GT 650M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 570X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
