GeForce GT 430 vs GT 650M SLI

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 650M SLI with GeForce GT 430, including specs and performance data.

GT 650M SLI
2012
2x2 GB GDDR5
4.37
+224%

GT 650M SLI outperforms GT 430 by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking645986
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.05
Power efficiencyno data2.19
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN13E-GEGF108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)11 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76896
CUDA cores per GPUno data96
Core clock speed790 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed835 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data49 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data98 °C
Texture fill rateno data11.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 - 28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataHDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.2
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p79
+229%
24−27
−229%
Full HD50
+257%
14−16
−257%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.64

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Fortnite 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Valorant 55−60
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 139
+334%
30−35
−334%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Dota 2 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Fortnite 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Valorant 55−60
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Dota 2 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Valorant 55−60
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Valorant 50−55
+550%
8−9
−550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how GT 650M SLI and GT 430 compete in popular games:

  • GT 650M SLI is 229% faster in 900p
  • GT 650M SLI is 257% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 650M SLI is 850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GT 650M SLI surpassed GT 430 in all 45 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.37 1.35
Recency 22 March 2012 11 October 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GT 650M SLI has a 223.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 650M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 430 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GT 430 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M SLI
GeForce GT 650M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GeForce GT 430

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1170 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M SLI or GeForce GT 430, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.