Radeon 620 vs GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640M GT 645M GT 650M GT 730M GT 745A GT 745M GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 755M GT 755M Mac Edition GTX 660M GTX 660M Mac Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
610 610M 620 625 630 660M 680M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition and Radeon 620, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 650M Mac Edition
2012
512 MB GDDR5, 45 Watt
1.44

620 outperforms 650M Mac Edition by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 650M Mac Edition GT 650M Mac Edition
Radeon 620 Radeon 620

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1032900
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.463.50
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK107Polaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 July 2012 (13 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed900 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8024.58
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3224
L1 Cache32 KB96 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1254 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.26 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.44 2.28
Recency 12 July 2012 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 50 Watt

GT 650M Mac Edition has 11.1% lower power consumption.

Radeon 620, on the other hand, has a 58.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 650M Mac Edition GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
vs
R6 M255DX Radeon R6 M255DX
Radeon 620 Radeon 620
vs
GT 645M GeForce GT 645M
GT 650M Mac Edition GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
vs
GTX 660M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GTX 675MX Mac Edition GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
vs
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
GTX 680MX Mac Edition GTX 680MX Mac Edition
vs
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GTX 680MX Mac Edition GTX 680MX Mac Edition
vs
GTX 295 Single PCB GTX 295 Single PCB
GT 650M Mac Edition GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
vs
HD 7510 OEM Radeon HD 7510 OEM
GT 650M Mac Edition GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
vs
ATI Xbox 360 GPU Xbox 360 GPU
GeForce 620M GeForce 620M
vs
RX 560D Radeon RX 560D
GeForce 620M GeForce 620M
vs
RX 560 896SP Radeon RX 560 896SP
GeForce 620M GeForce 620M
vs
RX 560X Radeon RX 560X
GeForce 620M GeForce 620M
vs
RX 560DX Radeon RX 560DX
RX 580 XTR Radeon RX 580 XTR
vs
HD Graphics P5700 HD Graphics P5700

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 68 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition or Radeon 620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.