FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition with FirePro M4150, including specs and performance data.

GT 650M Mac Edition
2012
512 MB GDDR5, 45 Watt
1.44

M4150 outperforms 650M Mac Edition by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1037880
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.46no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Opal
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 July 2012 (13 years ago)16 October 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed900 MHz715 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate28.8017.16
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3224
L1 Cache32 KB96 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1254 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.26 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 2.48
Recency 12 July 2012 16 October 2013
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB

FirePro M4150 has a 72.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The FirePro M4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M4150 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
AMD FirePro M4150
FirePro M4150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate FirePro M4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition or FirePro M4150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.