Radeon RX 5600 OEM vs GeForce GT 645M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 645M with Radeon RX 5600 OEM, including specs and performance data.

GT 645M
2012
2 GB DDR3\GDDR5, 32 Watt
2.25

5600 OEM outperforms 645M by a whopping 1211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking903217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.4015.10
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2012 (13 years ago)21 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speedUp to 710 MHz1130 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate22.69199.7
Floating-point processing power0.5445 TFLOPS6.39 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32128
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 64.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 645M 2.25
RX 5600 OEM 29.49
+1211%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 645M 943
Samples: 296
RX 5600 OEM 12333
+1208%
Samples: 35

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Full HD24
−1150%
300−350
+1150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Fortnite 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Valorant 40−45
−1120%
500−550
+1120%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
−1193%
750−800
+1193%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Dota 2 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Fortnite 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Valorant 40−45
−1120%
500−550
+1120%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Dota 2 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Valorant 40−45
−1120%
500−550
+1120%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1194%
220−230
+1194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1173%
280−290
+1173%
Valorant 18−20
−1178%
230−240
+1178%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Valorant 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

This is how GT 645M and RX 5600 OEM compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600 OEM is 1067% faster in 900p
  • RX 5600 OEM is 1150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.25 29.49
Recency 1 October 2012 21 January 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 150 Watt

GT 645M has 368.8% lower power consumption.

RX 5600 OEM, on the other hand, has a 1210.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 645M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 645M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5600 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
GeForce GT 645M
AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Radeon RX 5600 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 111 votes

Rate GeForce GT 645M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 102 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 645M or Radeon RX 5600 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.