Radeon R7 M465X vs GeForce GT 645M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 645M and Radeon R7 M465X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 645M
2012
2 GB DDR3\GDDR5, 32 Watt
2.25

R7 M465X outperforms GT 645M by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking862669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.15no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Tropo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)15 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speedUp to 710 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Wattno data
Texture fill rate22.6929.60
Floating-point processing power0.5445 TFLOPS0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 64.0 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 645M 2.25
R7 M465X 4.30
+91.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 645M 934
R7 M465X 1786
+91.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Full HD24
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Fortnite 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Valorant 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Dota 2 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Fortnite 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Valorant 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Dota 2 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Valorant 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Valorant 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Valorant 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

This is how GT 645M and R7 M465X compete in popular games:

  • R7 M465X is 83% faster in 900p
  • R7 M465X is 88% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.25 4.30
Recency 1 October 2012 15 May 2016

R7 M465X has a 91.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The Radeon R7 M465X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 645M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
GeForce GT 645M
AMD Radeon R7 M465X
Radeon R7 M465X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 102 votes

Rate GeForce GT 645M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M465X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 645M or Radeon R7 M465X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.