T1000 vs GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640M GT 640M Mac Edition GT 645M GT 650M GT 650M Mac Edition GT 730M GT 745M GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 755M GT 755M Mac Edition GTX 660M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro T1000 T400 T400 4 GB T600 T1000 T1000 8 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition with T1000, including specs and performance data.

GT 640M Mac Edition
2013
512 MB GDDR5, 32 Watt
0.90

T1000 outperforms GT 640M Mac Edition by a whopping 1797% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 640M Mac Edition GT 640M Mac Edition
T1000 T1000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1111294
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.2227.00
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK107TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 February 2013 (12 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed745 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1395 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate23.8478.12
Floating-point processing power0.5722 TFLOPS2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth40 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA3.07.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+0%
77
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how GT 640M Mac Edition and T1000 compete in popular games:

  • T1000 is 1800% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.90 17.07
Recency 3 February 2013 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 50 Watt

GT 640M Mac Edition has 56.3% lower power consumption.

T1000, on the other hand, has a 1796.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is a notebook card while T1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
NVIDIA T1000
T1000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640M Mac Edition GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4650 Mobility Radeon HD 4650
T1000 T1000
vs
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
GT 640M Mac Edition GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
vs
R4 (Beema) Radeon R4 (Beema)
A2 A2
vs
Arc A380 Arc A380
GeForce 930M GeForce 930M
vs
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
GTX 1080 GTX 1080
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080
vs
R9 M390 Radeon R9 M390
GTX 970 GeForce GTX 970
vs
Tesla K40d Tesla K40d
R7 M360 Radeon R7 M360
vs
Arc Pro A30M Arc Pro A30M
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
K3000M Quadro K3000M
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
Pro WX 4170 Mobile Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
vs
Arc Pro A40 Arc Pro A40

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1
9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7
64 votes

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition or T1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.