T1000 vs GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition with T1000, including specs and performance data.
T1000 outperforms GT 640M Mac Edition by a whopping 1797% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1111 | 294 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 2.22 | 27.00 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Turing (2018−2022) |
GPU code name | GK107 | TU117 |
Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 February 2013 (12 years ago) | 6 May 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1065 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1395 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1,270 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 50 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 78.12 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.5722 TFLOPS | 2.5 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 8 | 32 |
TMUs | 32 | 56 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | no data | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 3−4
−1800%
| 57
+1800%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
Atomic Heart | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Atomic Heart | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 62
+0%
|
62
+0%
|
Fortnite | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Valorant | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Atomic Heart | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 57
+0%
|
57
+0%
|
Fortnite | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 77
+0%
|
77
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 35
+0%
|
35
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 64
+0%
|
64
+0%
|
Valorant | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 53
+0%
|
53
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35
+0%
|
35
+0%
|
Valorant | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Fortnite | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Valorant | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Atomic Heart | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Fortnite | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
This is how GT 640M Mac Edition and T1000 compete in popular games:
- T1000 is 1800% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.90 | 17.07 |
Recency | 3 February 2013 | 6 May 2021 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 50 Watt |
GT 640M Mac Edition has 56.3% lower power consumption.
T1000, on the other hand, has a 1796.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is a notebook card while T1000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.