Radeon 610M vs GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition with Radeon 610M, including specs and performance data.

GT 640M Mac Edition
2013
512 MB GDDR5, 32 Watt
1.09

Radeon 610M outperforms GT 640M Mac Edition by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1049753
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGK107RDNA 2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 February 2013 (11 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price$50 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed745 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate23.8415.20
Floating-point performance572.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition and Radeon 610M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth40 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−180%
14
+180%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Hitman 3 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−183%
17
+183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Hitman 3 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−167%
8
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−180%
14
+180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−175%
11
+175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−233%
10
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−250%
7
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hitman 3 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 1−2
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

This is how GT 640M Mac Edition and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 610M is 180% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 2.85
Recency 3 February 2013 20 September 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 15 Watt

The Radeon 610M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is a desktop card while Radeon 610M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 570 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.