Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640M GT 645M GT 650M GT 650M Mac Edition GT 730M GT 745M GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 755M GT 755M Mac Edition GTX 660M GTX 660M Mac Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Qualcomm Adreno 685

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition and Qualcomm Adreno 680, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 640M Mac Edition
2013
512 MB GDDR5, 32 Watt
0.96

Qualcomm Adreno 680 outperforms 640M Mac Edition by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 640M Mac Edition GT 640M Mac Edition
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1163913
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.3023.37
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK107no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 February 2013 (12 years ago)6 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed745 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate23.84no data
Floating-point processing power0.5722 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth40 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.96 2.13
Recency 3 February 2013 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 7 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has a 121.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 357.1% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640M Mac Edition GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4650 Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680
vs
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
GT 640M Mac Edition GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
vs
HD 7470M Radeon HD 7470M
GTX 660M Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
vs
RX Vega 9 RX Vega 9
GTX 660M Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
vs
Iris Plus Graphics Plus Graphics
GTX 660M Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
vs
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU Pro 16-Core GPU
GTX 660M Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
vs
HD 7410M HD 7410M
GT 640M Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
vs
ATI FireMV 2200 PCI FireMV 2200 PCI
GT 640M Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
vs
RX 6700M RX 6700M
GTX 680MX Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
vs
E9175 PCIe Radeon E9175 PCIe
GTX 680MX Mac Edition GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
vs
RTX 4060 AD106 RTX 4060 AD106
RSX Reality Synthesizer NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer
vs
HD Graphics 10EU Graphics 10EU
GT 650M Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
vs
HD 6490M Mac Edition HD 6490M Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 11 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 43 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition or Qualcomm Adreno 680, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.