UHD Graphics 730 vs GeForce GT 640M LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640M LE with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

GT 640M LE
2012
2 GB DDR3\DDR5, 20 Watt
1.67

UHD Graphics 730 outperforms GT 640M LE by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking969734
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency3.9819.45
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF108Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 May 2012 (13 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$849.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresUp to 384192
Core clock speedUp to 500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0518.60
Floating-point processing power0.289 TFLOPS0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPs46
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\DDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128bitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed785 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidthUp to 28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 640M LE 1.67
UHD Graphics 730 3.83
+129%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 640M LE Samples: 362 701
UHD Graphics 730 1603
+129%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
−111%
40−45
+111%
Full HD21
−114%
45−50
+114%

Cost per frame, $

1080p40.48no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Fortnite 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Valorant 35−40
−116%
80−85
+116%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−122%
80−85
+122%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Dota 2 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Fortnite 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Valorant 35−40
−116%
80−85
+116%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Dota 2 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Valorant 35−40
−116%
80−85
+116%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%
Valorant 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Valorant 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

This is how GT 640M LE and UHD Graphics 730 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 is 111% faster in 900p
  • UHD Graphics 730 is 114% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 3.83
Recency 4 May 2012 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 has a 129.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640M LE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640M LE is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
GeForce GT 640M LE
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 62 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1493 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640M LE or UHD Graphics 730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.