Radeon Instinct MI355X vs GeForce GT 640M LE
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 990 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.01 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | CDNA 4.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | GF108 | CDNA Next |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 May 2012 (13 years ago) | 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $849.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | Up to 384 | 16384 |
| Core clock speed | Up to 500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 585 million | 185,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 1400 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 12.05 | 2,457.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.289 TFLOPS | 78.64 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | no data |
| TMUs | 16 | 1024 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 1024 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 16 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 256 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | OAM Module |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | HBM3e |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 288 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 8192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 785 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | Up to 28.8 GB/s | 8.19 TB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
| HDCP | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | - |
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | N/A |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 288 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 1400 Watt |
GT 640M LE has 6900% lower power consumption.
Instinct MI355X, on the other hand, has a 14300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640M LE and Radeon Instinct MI355X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 640M LE is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI355X is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
