Radeon Instinct MI300A vs GeForce GT 640M LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking975not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency3.98no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameGF108Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 May 2012 (13 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$849.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresUp to 38419456
Core clock speedUp to 500 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2100 MHz
Number of transistors585 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate12.052,554
Floating-point processing power0.289 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs161216
Tensor Coresno data1216
L1 Cache128 KB4.8 MB
L2 Cache256 KB16 MB
L3 Cacheno data256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\DDR5HBM3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB192 GB
Memory bus width128bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed785 MHz2525 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 28.8 GB/s10.3 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 APIN/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2012 6 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 192 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 750 Watt

GT 640M LE has 3650% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640M LE and Radeon Instinct MI300A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640M LE is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI300A is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
GeForce GT 640M LE
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A
Radeon Instinct MI300A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 62 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640M LE or Radeon Instinct MI300A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.