ATI Radeon HD 4670 vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
610 610 OEM 610 PCI 610 PCIe x1 620 620 OEM 625 OEM 630 630 OEM 630 Rev. 2 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 635 OEM 640 640 OEM 640 OEM Rebrand 640 Rev. 2 645 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E4690 HD 4650 HD 4650 AGP HD 4670 HD 4670 AGP HD 4670 X2 HD 4700 HD 4710 HD 4720

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and Radeon HD 4670, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 640 Rev. 2
2013, $89
1 GB GDDR5, 49 Watt
3.29
+262%

640 Rev. 2 outperforms HD 4670 by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
ATI HD 4670 HD 4670

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7931182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.190.01
Power efficiency5.171.19
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK208RV730
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 May 2013 (12 years ago)10 September 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 $67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GT 640 Rev. 2 has 1800% better value for money than ATI HD 4670.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384320
Core clock speed1046 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors915 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt59 Watt
Texture fill rate33.4724.00
Floating-point processing power0.8033 TFLOPS0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3232
L1 Cache32 KB64 KB
L2 Cache128 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm193 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.29 0.91
Recency 29 May 2013 10 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 59 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has a 262% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 4870 Radeon HD 4870
ATI HD 4670 Radeon HD 4670
vs
ATI HD 5550 Radeon HD 5550
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GTS 450 GeForce GTS 450
GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
vs
6100 + nForce 405 GeForce 6100 + nForce 405
GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
vs
HD 7350 OEM PCI Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI
GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
vs
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104
GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
vs
RX 9070 GRE 16 GB Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16 GB
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
RX 580 XTR Radeon RX 580 XTR
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
ATI Mobility HD 2400 XT Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
R7 265 Radeon R7 265
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
HD 6570 Radeon HD 6570
GTX 780 GTX 780
vs
GTX 750 v2 GTX 750 v2
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
GT 710 GeForce GT 710

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 37 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 170 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 or Radeon HD 4670, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.