RTX A4500 vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
610 610 OEM 610 PCI 610 PCIe x1 620 620 OEM 625 OEM 630 630 OEM 630 Rev. 2 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 635 OEM 640 640 OEM 640 OEM Rebrand 640 Rev. 2 645 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A10 PCIe A10G A10M A40 PCIe CMP 90HX Quadro RTX 8200 Quadro RTX A6000 A40 A4500 A5000 A5000-8Q A5500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

GT 640 Rev. 2
2013, $89
1 GB GDDR5, 49 Watt
3.30

RTX A4500 outperforms 640 Rev. 2 by a whopping 1430% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
RTX A4500 RTX A4500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking79169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency5.1819.40
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK208GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 May 2013 (12 years ago)23 November 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3847168
Core clock speed1046 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors915 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate33.47369.6
Floating-point processing power0.8033 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs32224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cache32 KB7 MB
L2 Cache128 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/s640.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.58.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.30 50.49
Recency 29 May 2013 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 200 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has 308.2% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 1430% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GTS 450 GeForce GTS 450
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
vs
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GT 740 GeForce GT 740
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
7050 + nForce 630i 7050 + nForce 630i
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
7050 SE + nForce 630a 7050 SE + nForce 630a
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
7050 + nForce 630a 7050 + nForce 630a
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
9500 GT Rev. 2 9500 GT Rev. 2
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
RX 5770 RX 5770
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
615 OEM 615 OEM
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
UHD Graphics 770 Mobile UHD Graphics 770 Mobile
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 4070 GDDR6 RTX 4070 GDDR6
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
R7 M350 2GB R7 M350 2GB
GTX 780 GTX 780
vs
R9 M390X R9 M390X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 35 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 212 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 or RTX A4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.