GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs GT 640 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
630 Rev. 2 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 635 OEM 640 Rev. 2 710
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5050 Mobile 5060 Mobile 5070 Mobile 5070 Ti Mobile 5080 Mobile 5090 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 with GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GT 640 Rev. 2
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 49 Watt
3.24

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 640 Rev. 2 by a whopping 1656% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking76641
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency5.0372.25
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGK208GB205
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 May 2013 (12 years ago)March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845888
Core clock speed1046 MHz847 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1447 MHz
Number of transistors915 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate33.47266.2
Floating-point processing power0.8033 TFLOPS17.04 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs32184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA3.512.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−1771%
131
+1771%
1440p4−5
−2025%
85
+2025%
4K3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.71no data
1440p22.25no data
4K29.67no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 316
+0%
316
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 244
+0%
244
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 164
+0%
164
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+0%
154
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 174
+0%
174
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how GT 640 Rev. 2 and RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 1771% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 2025% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 1933% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 36 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.24 56.89
Recency 29 May 2013 on March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 60 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has 22.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1655.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 4870 Radeon HD 4870
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
vs
RTX 4080 Mobile GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
Radeon 540 Radeon 540
RX 9060 XT Radeon RX 9060 XT
vs
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
Iris Graphics 5100 Iris Graphics 5100
vs
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
RTX 5050 Mobile RTX 5050 Mobile
vs
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
K2100M Quadro K2100M
vs
GTX 770 GeForce GTX 770
RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q
vs
GTX 770 GTX 770
Pro 560X Radeon Pro 560X
vs
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
vs
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
vs
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
Iris Graphics 540 Iris Graphics 540
vs
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 29 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 143 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.