Radeon 660M vs GeForce GT 640 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 OEM with Radeon 660M, including specs and performance data.

GT 640 OEM
2012
2 GB DDR3, 50 Watt
1.69

Radeon 660M outperforms GT 640 OEM by a whopping 479% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking892424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGK107RDNA 2 Rembrandt
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$99 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed797 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate25.5045.60
Floating-point performance612.1 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 640 OEM and Radeon 660M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1782 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA3.0no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−525%
25
+525%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−500%
24
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−550%
26
+550%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−567%
20
+567%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−500%
45−50
+500%
Hitman 3 3−4
−600%
21
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−543%
45
+543%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−550%
39
+550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−550%
26
+550%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−533%
19
+533%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14
+600%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−500%
45−50
+500%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−486%
40−45
+486%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−650%
15
+650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−540%
32
+540%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−525%
25
+525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−500%
45−50
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−633%
22
+633%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−550%
26
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−650%
15
+650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 5−6
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 5−6
Far Cry 5 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Hitman 3 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 5−6

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Hitman 3 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

This is how GT 640 OEM and Radeon 660M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 660M is 525% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 9.78
Recency 24 April 2012 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

The Radeon 660M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 OEM is a desktop card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GeForce GT 640 OEM
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 233 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.