GeForce 6200 TurboCache vs GT 640 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 OEM and GeForce 6200 TurboCache, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.


GT 640 OEM
2012
2 GB DDR3, 50 Watt
1.54
+1183%

640 OEM outperforms 6200 TurboCache by a whopping 1183% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10111501
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.37no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGK107NV44 B2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (13 years ago)15 December 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed797 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate25.501.400
Floating-point processing power0.6121 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs324
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length145 mm165 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.54 0.12
Recency 24 April 2012 15 December 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

GT 640 OEM has a 1183% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 640 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6200 TurboCache in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 61 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 OEM or GeForce 6200 TurboCache, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.