GeForce G110M vs GT 635M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking992not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.89no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF116G96C
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)8 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresUp to 14416
Core clock speedUp to 675 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed753 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,170 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate16.203.200
Floating-point processing power0.3888 TFLOPS0.032 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus widthUp to 192bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 43.2 GB/s8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDisplayPortDual Link DVIVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x15362048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-
Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 14 Watt

GT 635M has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G110M, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 635M and GeForce G110M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GeForce GT 635M
NVIDIA GeForce G110M
GeForce G110M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 463 votes

Rate GeForce GT 635M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce G110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.