GeForce GT 520 vs GT 630M

Place in performance ranking	959	1105
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	0.01
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	N13P-GL/GL2	GF119
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 December 2011 (12 years ago)	13 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$59
Current price	$1121	$88 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 630M has 100% better value for money than GT 520.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	48
CUDA cores	96	48
Core clock speed	Up to 800 MHz	810 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	102 °C
Texture fill rate	Up to 12.8 billion/sec	6.5 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	253.4 gflops	155.52 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 630M and GeForce GT 520 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	16x PCI-E 2.0
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Height	no data	2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3\GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB (DDR3)
Memory bus width	Up to 128bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth	Up to 32.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
DirectX 11.2	12 API	no data
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.2
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 630M 1.39
+73.8%

GT 520 0.80

GT 630M outperforms GT 520 by 74% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 630M 539
+73.9%

GT 520 310

GT 630M outperforms GT 520 by 74% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 630M 719
+89.2%

GT 520 380

GT 630M outperforms GT 520 by 89% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GT 630M 2348
+84.7%

GT 520 1271

GT 630M outperforms GT 520 by 85% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	19 +90%	10−12 −90%
Full HD	16 +77.8%	9−10 −77.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+100%

2−3

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Hitman 3	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Hitman 3	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
+100%

1−2

−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1