Radeon RX 5300 vs GeForce GT 630

Place in performance ranking	881	265
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.08	7.26
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GF108	Navi 14
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	15 May 2012 (11 years ago)	28 May 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$99.99	no data
Current price	$112 (1.1x MSRP)	$558

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5300 has 8975% better value for money than GT 630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	1408
Core clock speed	810 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1645 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.96	144.8
Floating-point performance	311.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	145 mm	180 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	168.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 630 1.75

RX 5300 19.74
+1028%

Radeon RX 5300 outperforms GeForce GT 630 by 1028% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 630 679

RX 5300 7641
+1025%

Radeon RX 5300 outperforms GeForce GT 630 by 1025% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	1.75	19.74
Recency	15 May 2012	28 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	100 Watt