Radeon HD 6630M vs GeForce GT 630

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GT 630
2012
2048 MB DDR3
1.75

Radeon HD 6630M outperforms GeForce GT 630 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking882881
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.080.10
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF108Whistler-LP
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (11 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data
Current price$112 (1.1x MSRP)$338

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 6630M has 25% better value for money than GT 630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96480
Core clock speed810 MHz485 MHz
Number of transistors585 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt26 Watt
Texture fill rate12.9612.00
Floating-point performance311.0 gflops480.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 630 and Radeon HD 6630M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 630 1.75
HD 6630M 1.77
+1.1%

Radeon HD 6630M outperforms GeForce GT 630 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 630 679
HD 6630M 684
+0.7%

Radeon HD 6630M outperforms GeForce GT 630 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−6.3%
17
+6.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.75 1.77
Recency 15 May 2012 4 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 26 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GT 630 and Radeon HD 6630M.

Be aware that GeForce GT 630 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6630M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GeForce GT 630
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Radeon HD 6630M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 2469 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 40 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6630M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.